Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Perintah Penahanan Terhadap Terdakwa Yang Belum Memperoleh Putusan Berkekuatan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana

PEDO, Yustinus (2020) Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Perintah Penahanan Terhadap Terdakwa Yang Belum Memperoleh Putusan Berkekuatan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 4 (1). pp. 39-50. ISSN 2580-698X

Text Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Perintah Penahanan Terhadap Terdakwa Yang Belum Memperoleh Putusan Berkekuatan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (280kB)

Abstract

Detention against the defendant actually that normal but a problem when those arrested were conducted by a judge who has not authorized again to making arrests and the problems will appear on how basis of consideration a judge in dropped a restraining order against the defendant who had a fixed law and effect law what incurred if the prosecutor execute a restraining order by a judge against the defendant having no permanent legal entity.To answer this issue and this research using research empirical law with methods used the interview.Based on the results of the study found that the judge actually does arrest for the purpose of simplify the work of the prosecutor but it was being violated the legal right to appeal and actually court judge first instance are not authorized again to hold with a pedestal s any suggested the defendant that should not be done if the detention of the defendant eases a judge in the investigation.

Actions (login required)

View Item